- #PIXEL 3 DEUS EX MANKIND DIVIDED BACKGROUNDS DRIVERS#
- #PIXEL 3 DEUS EX MANKIND DIVIDED BACKGROUNDS DRIVER#
- #PIXEL 3 DEUS EX MANKIND DIVIDED BACKGROUNDS FULL#
I personally wouldnt pay over £1000 for a TXP but a lot of people do and for just 20% performance for the extra £400-£500. The wattage does matter…if you want to save a few pence per week or you have your card in a very small shoebox with no decent airflow. If Devs get the MGPU right then it will benefit everyone with dual card setups. It has already been proven by a few of the sites that two RX480s bench/game faster than the 1070(As I think this is the card you are eluding to) and just a whisker behind the 1080 in most games. Secondly I do think that 59% is good for a first un-tweaked attempt at MGPU in this title by those devs….as I said it is only going to get better (If the work is put in, of course).
#PIXEL 3 DEUS EX MANKIND DIVIDED BACKGROUNDS DRIVER#
GPUs integrated or discrete should always be available not matter the make model or brand to work for their intended purposes under and OS/API managed abstraction layers via the simplest driver model that allows the closest to the metal access! There is no excuse there will never be an excuse for letting this happen in the first place! Replyįirstly, why not go get a proper login and stop hiding behind the Anonymous Nvidia User. It’s rather shameful for anyone to find the restricting of hardware for any selfish reasons by the GPU/SOC makers acceptable.
#PIXEL 3 DEUS EX MANKIND DIVIDED BACKGROUNDS FULL#
What a decades lone ripoff of the consumer to not have full always on access to any processing hardware plugged into their computers!
#PIXEL 3 DEUS EX MANKIND DIVIDED BACKGROUNDS DRIVERS#
The OS makers should have never white-listed ANY GPU hardware except the GPUs that only had the simplest drivers that only allowed for the closest to the metal GPU features to be made available to the OSs/Graphics APIs! Any GPU hardware plugged into a computer should have the simplest drivers that allow for all the hardware’s feature sets be made available to the OS/APIs. The entire OS/and API industries should have never allowed any hardware makers to offer any feature sets restricted at the GPU drivers’ level other than a close to the metal features that allow for the graphics APIs, and the OSs, and the games/gaming engines themselves the full control over the GPUs’ hardware. ReplyĬF and SLI have been poorly developed over a long period of time by the Few GPU hardware makers with their limited resources and selfish market intentions. That said, the major engine developers (Epic, Crytek, Unity, etc.) could jump on the scene at any moment. Oxide took this burden (again, except for Firaxis for Civilization: Beyond Earth in Mantle) but they seem to be alone at the moment.
It does, however, require the game developer to do (and support) everything themselves.
This circumvents SLI, and GPU vendors should never interfere with this, but it still allows multi-GPU scaling. At that point, the developer can just manage multiple lists (or even multiple whole contexts if required) to whatever GPU they care about. It's also possible to ask the system "tell me all the GPUs you have" with the new graphics APIs (and the compute APIs as well). At one point, SLI used to cut a single frame up, but basically no-one does that anymore (except for Firaxis for Civilization: Beyond Earth in Mantle). We might see per-eye for VR and 3D at some point too, though. Usually, this means taking the commands given by the game, sorting them by frame, and dividing them between nearly-identical cards. Its advantage is that NVIDIA (or AMD for CrossFire) takes care of everything in the driver. SLI (along with CrossFire) is an implementation of Multi-GPU.
0 kommentar(er)
